Agree with some of his points, disagree with others. I do think it cheapens the tourney to allow drinking while bowling. However I see nothing wrong with giving a once in a lifetime award for 300's 800's etc. I would like to see them give one really nice award for the first, similar to what we got back in the 70's. I have two diamond rings for my first 2 300's. That is one more than I need. I have 13 800's, but didn't shoot my first till after they cheapened the rings. I would trade all 12 of my subsequent awards for one nice 800 ring.
I probably most strongly disagree with his opinion on publicizing the pattern for nationals. First, it always gets out, and a certain percentage find out anyway. It would also give guys who bowl later in the tourney an advantage by getting to see how the guy played the shot early. When I hear someone say it gives too much advantage to the better bowlers, that sounds like an argument for doing something. Maybe we don't want to reward people who practice and learn how to deal with different conditions.
Bottom line, the guy is probably a nice guy and I admire his longevity in the game, but I don't think he knows any more about bowling than a lot of the local association guys who go every year, and still know almost nothing about the technical and competitive side of the game.